The Idle Screens

Users today are surrounded by numerous devices with display screens, most of them connected to the Internet, but are lying unutilized. Alexa soon could replace them as an interactive companion.

CNBC recently published an article titled The First Investor in Snapchat Explains How Alexa Could Replace TV for a Lot of People in which the author says:

The average American watches 5 hours of TV a day, but they’re not always paying full attention: Sometimes, the TV is on in the background, as a sort of companion.

Referring to Snapchat investor Jeremy Liew in the article, the author says that most millennials today use TVs, smart or not as ambient TV wherein the background noise acts as a companion. The generation has become accustomed to this behavior. Alexa, according to Liew, can change that when the passive TV viewer could become an active user thanks to the AI powered personal digital assistant. Current streaming service providers like Netflix, Hulu, and YouTube are not doing enough to turn these ambient TVs into appointment TVs. Alexa just might be the solution they are looking for.

Vishal Ingole, March 28, 2017

Amazon Rekognition Now Estimates Age

It is a good thing lying about one’s age has gone out of style. I Programmer reports, “Amazon Rekognition Can Now Estimate Your Age.” Writer Lucy Black reports on Rekognition’s remarkable progress identifying images, calling it the closest thing Amazon has to a true neural network service. Give it a photo, she writes, and then:

The data it can return varies from a bounding box to emotion, gender, eyes open, etc. Now it also includes an estimated age range for a person.

For now, the age ranges are pretty broad—“38 to 57,” for example. The article discusses this program and other Amazon AI undertakings, like Amazon AI Services (part of AWS), language-processing system Lex, and text-to-speech service Polly. See the article for more details.

Cynthia Murrell, March 3, 2017

Alexa Business Model About More Than Shopping Revenue

Amazon’s CEO dismisses the notion that Alexa is all about cashing in on an ever present, voice-activated shopping app, we’re told in Yahoo’s article, “Jeff Bezos Says We Have it All Wrong About Amazon’s Alexa.” Bezos asserts their priority is to explore the potentials of voice– playing music, controlling appliances, etc. Writer Matt Weinberger observes:

As people build more ‘skills’ for Alexa, they’re still working out how and where it can be useful. … Still, Bezos’ comments shake up the conventional wisdom on Alexa’s role in Amazon’s grand strategy.

As Bezos notes, (unless reordering) shopping really requires some sort of screen. Our question: is he sincere, or attempting to misdirect the competition? There are rumors Echo may be about to grow a touch screen.

Cynthia Murrell, March 2, 2017

AI Fear Mongering?

Huffpost Tech exclaims, “Google’s New AI Becomes ‘Highly Aggressive’ to Get What It Wants.” Is the robot rebellion beginning? Reporter Oscar Williams describes an experiment wherein two DeepMind agents learned to compete for a limited number of virtual apples—by pulling out virtual lasers. He writes:

Without using the laser beams, they would end up with equal numbers of apples, so the aggression was rewarded. And the more sophisticated the neural network, the more aggressive the agents became.

In another game, however, in which cooperation was rewarded, the AIs … cooperated. The software, it seems, will adapt to each situation—which is just what we want it to do. As for aggressively pursuing “what it wants,” remember that depends entirely on what programmers have specified.

Cynthia Murrell, March 1, 2017

A Nosy Butler for You

Amazon’s Alexa is yet to make any money, but it surely is assimilating humongous amount of Big Data of its customers, and probably is eavesdropping more than you expected.

CNET in an article titled Alexa Will Talk You into Loving Amazon says:

Amazon isn’t seeing any profit from Alexa or the Echo smart speaker that houses the virtual butler because the company keeps plowing massive investments into the voice software.

This is not surprising for a company like Amazon as the primary intent of Alexa was never meant to be a private virtual assistant. The aim was to turn users of Alexa into loyal customers that will help Amazon sell more. In the process, Amazon also collects a lot of personal information about the user, which the company ultimately will use for various purposes.

Technically, Amazon Echo powered by Alexa is a smart device, and it would not take dubious actors to figure out that it easily can be turned into a listening post. As a matter of fact, it would become even easier for people with right skill sets to start listening to your private conversations without bothering about placing listening devices or mobile vans outside your home.

As Michael R. Levin, C-Founder, Consumer Intelligence Research Partners says in the article:

Amazon’s real goal, is introducing you to Alexa and placing her in as many places in your life as possible. That’s assuming you’re not weirded out by having microphones around you that are always listening for the word Alexa.

Companies like Vizio have already been fined for collecting customer information illegally through their smart TVs. Amazon is not far behind. However, how far the rot goes, only time can tell.

Vishal Ingole, February 28, 2017

Amazons Alexa Sees Rapid Adoption Among Companies

Tech companies are rapidly adopting voice command tech, and Amazon’s Alexa seems to be winning the race.

A news article on Investor titled Amazon Alexa Dominates Voice-Command Tech at CES 2017 reveals:

At CES 2017, numerous companies announced that they are using Amazon’s Alexa voice-response technology to control their devices with spoken commands.

Though Apple with Siri and Google with Google Voice were one of the early adopters of voice-based tech assistants, Amazon with Alexa has taken a substantial lead.

One of the reasons for Alexa’s large scale adoption can be attributed to the fact that it has been released to third-party developers so that they can integrate Alexa into their smart devices. Interestingly, Google used a similar strategy to gain a stronghold on the mobile OS market.

Amazon no more is just an online retailer. Matter of fact, with Alexa, Amazon will be able to create an army of loyal customers that will be hard to match.

Vishal Ingole, February 23, 2017

Samsung Bixby a Versatile Linguist

 The Galaxy S8’s built-in personal assistant, Bixby, will lead the AI personal-assistant field in terms of the number of languages supported, according to Trusted Reviews’ article, “Samsung Could Trump Google with this Galaxy S8 Feature.” Not only Google stands to be outdone– the S8 assistant will interact in eight languages, which is seven more than Amazon’s English-only Alexa currently supports. (Reportedly, German, Chinese, and perhaps other languages are in Alexa’s near future.)

Bixby, rumor has it, is based on tech Samsung acquired when it bought Viv Labs last year. Based in San Jose, California, that company was founded in 2012 by three of the folks who’d developed Apple’s Siri.

English, Korean and Chinese will all be on board from the start, as will up to five other languages (via SamMobile). By way of comparison, Google Assistant is still only available in five languages (English, Hindi, German, Japanese and Portuguese)

 And the language race is on. This is but one aspect of the competition. Will Amazon counter Samsung’s AI precociousness by making its own microwaves and ovens for Alexa to work with? And what of Samsung’s plans to connect Bixby to appliances and wearable tech? Stay tuned.

Cynthia Murrell, February 23, 2017

Translation Earpiece on Horizon

A relic from the future is due out this year: the wearable translator. Startup Waverly Labs shares a YouTube video, “A World Without Language Barriers,” to introduce their product. They have raised over $4 million through Indiegogo for the development of the device, named the Pilot. The video should intrigue anyone who follows machine translation. A Waverly press release specifies:

Pilot uses the latest technologies in speech recognition, machine translation and wearable technology to allow users to converse without language barriers. Pilot includes a second earpiece for wireless music streaming and a mobile app, which toggles between languages.

This could also be valuable for use with foreign-language videos and other media, unlocking vast stores of knowledge for many. My question—Will the translation quality actually exceed today’s imperfect machine translation? If not, users will have to be on alert for crossed wires; the earpiece may lead one to forget errors may occur.

Early funding is now closed, but the company has moved pre-orders to its website. Each unit costs $249, and they expect to deliver in “late summer 2017.” Oh, and they come in black, white, or red. Waverly Labs was founded in 2013 and is based in New York City.

Cynthia Murrell, February 21, 2017

 

 

 

 

Translation Earpiece on Horizon

A relic from the future is due out this year: the wearable translator. Startup Waverly Labs shares a YouTube video, “A World Without Language Barriers,” to introduce their product. They have raised over $4 million through Indiegogo for development of the device, named the Pilot. The video should intrigue anyone who follows machine translation. A Waverly press release specifies:

“Pilot uses the latest technologies in speech recognition, machine translation and wearable technology to allow users to converse without language barriers. Pilot includes a second earpiece for wireless music streaming and a mobile app, which toggles between languages.”

This could also be valuable for use with foreign-language videos and other media, unlocking vast stores of knowledge for many. My question—Will the translation quality actually exceed today’s imperfect machine translation? If not, users will have to be on alert for crossed wires; the earpiece may lead one to forget errors may occur.

Early funding is now closed, but the company has moved pre-orders to its website. Each unit costs $249, and they expect to deliver in “late summer 2017.” Oh, and they come in black, white, or red. Waverly Labs was founded in 2013, and is based in New York City.

Cynthia Murrell, February 3, 2017

Why Alexa Instead of Alex

Stereotypes inhabit comfort zones. Virtual assistants tend to be “female” in name and voice because, basically, people are more comfortable telling women what to do. Ramona Pringle at CBC News examines the trend in “Digital Sexism: Why Are All Virtual Assistants Women?

“Companies cite all sorts of research in their decision to make bots female. …  male voices are perceived as being more authoritative, whereas female voices are understood to be more helpful and supportive. These preconceptions carry over into synthetic voices, which essentially means that even computers are gender stereotyped.”

This practice reinforces the image of the subservient female every time a virtual assistant is used. The time to make a conscious decision to flout this convention is now.

Cynthia Murrell, January 19, 2017